One of the first steps to launching a successful startup is building your Minimal Viable Product. In essence, a Minimal Viable Product (MVP) is all about verifying the fact that there is a market where your potential company can call home and bring in paying customers. It’s about finding your early adopters and seeing exactly they are willing to pay for.
So, the minimum viable product is that product which has just those features (and no more) that allows you to ship a product that resonates with early adopters; some of whom will pay you money or give you feedback.
However, most entrepreneurs don’t think too much about about the the process of how they go about making a MVP and the extent in which they are truly verifying that their idea is solving a problem that people are willing to pay for. In turn, an entrepreneur might end up with an approach that is riddled with false feedback from their customers, or confirmation biases.
People lie to themselves in order to make sure that we can hear what we want to hear. It’s human. It happens a lot more than people might think, and in pretty different functions. Google “list of cognitive biases” for more on this.
But, when verifying whether an idea is a good fit to be a venture, I’ve found that there are some clearly flawed approaches, some approaches are situationally pragmatic, and some that are almost always ideal if you have the skills and resources to do so. Regardless there seems to be one big pattern: talk to your market.
The hierarchy of the ways you can validate ideas through MVP’s (and other strategies) can be categorized as: Flawed, Situational, and Ideal. Below are a few examples in each: